Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.

Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> On Sul, 2005-06-19 at 18:55, Pavel Machek wrote:
> ...
> >
> > If we are serious about utf-8 support in ext3, we should return
> > -EINVAL if someone passes non-canonical utf-8 string.
> 
> That would ironically not be standards compliant

Which standards?

The standards I've read (mostly XML- and web-related specs)
do say that non-standard UTF-8 octet sequences should be rejected.


Daniel
-- 
Daniel Barclay
[email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
    • From: Bernd Petrovitsch <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] drivers/hwmon/*: kfree() correct pointers
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pipe: do not return POLLERR for fifo_poll
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] late spinlock initialization in ieee1394/ohci
• Next by thread: Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]