Re: Inotify problem [was Re: 2.6.13-rc6-mm1]

On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 16:10 -0700, George Anzinger wrote:

> That IS strange.  1024 is on a "level" boundry, but then next level is 
> 2**15, not 2**11.  I will take a look.

Remember that the level is never filled, so maybe the smallest level
just gets an offset or something? Well, you're the expert I suppose, so
apologies if this didn't make sense. Just crossed my mind :)

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

---

• References:
  • Inotify problem [was Re: 2.6.13-rc6-mm1]
    • From: Reuben Farrelly <[email protected]>
  • Re: Inotify problem [was Re: 2.6.13-rc6-mm1]
    • From: John McCutchan <[email protected]>
  • Re: Inotify problem [was Re: 2.6.13-rc6-mm1]
    • From: Robert Love <[email protected]>
  • Re: Inotify problem [was Re: 2.6.13-rc6-mm1]
    • From: George Anzinger <[email protected]>
  • Re: Inotify problem [was Re: 2.6.13-rc6-mm1]
    • From: John McCutchan <[email protected]>
  • Re: Inotify problem [was Re: 2.6.13-rc6-mm1]
    • From: George Anzinger <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 14/15] sparc: remove use of asm/segment.h
• Next by Date: Re: Linux-2.6.13-rc7
• Previous by thread: Re: Inotify problem [was Re: 2.6.13-rc6-mm1]
• Next by thread: Re: Inotify problem [was Re: 2.6.13-rc6-mm1]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]