On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 21:03 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 11:54 -0700, George Anzinger wrote:
>
> > I think the best thing is to take idr into user space and emulate the
> > problem usage.
>
> Good plan, I guess. Do you think that's easy?
>
> > To this end, from the log it appears that you _might_ be
> > moving between 0, 1 and 2 entries increasing the number each time. It
> > also appears that the failure happens here:
> > add 1023
> > add 1024
> > find 1024 or is it the remove that fails? It also looks like 1024 got
> > allocated twice. Am I reading the log correctly?
>
> Remove 1024 fails, but add(please make it >1024) seems to return 1024,
> and find(1024) also seems to fail. Well, remove() probably has to
> find(), but I'm not really sure what inotify does (maybe find first, to
> see if it's valid).
Just to clarify, the remove() he is talking about isn't idr_remove, it
is inotify's remove. idr_find() is failing at 1024 which causes
inotify's remove to fail.
--
John McCutchan <[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |