On Thursday 25 August 2005 19:12, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> >On Sunday 07 August 2005 14:16, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> >
> >
> >FYI I have queued it, but cannot apply it because the necessary generic
> >code support is still not in mainline.
>
> Here's the patch for generic / i386 support; it's already in the -mm tree.
I'll probably not put that into my tree because I try to avoid generic
patches of other people - i assume it's queued for mainline.
If you want you can include the x86-64 patch with that submission too
(it's fine for me), alternatively I'll submit it later when I do the next
merge from i386 (that might take some time though) or remember about it
for some other reason.
>
> >Do you have any other optimizations pending for x86-64?
> >
> >There is still the iopl optimization that you did that is on my TODO list
> > to add. Anything else.
>
> I started porting the IOPL work, but got confused in my tree and end up
> patching asm-i386 with x86-64 code. The joy of unenforced source control!
Ok. When you don't get around to it I'll eventually.
>
> I have some other MMU optimizations pending that will hopefully be a win
> for all architectures; still measuring which alternative is best there.
Ok. Thanks. Please keep me updated on that.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |