On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Roman Zippel wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Yup. Let's get m68k into buildable shape for 2.6.13 with Al's minimal
> > patches, and if you have further improvements over that submit them as
> > split up patches through the usual channels. Having all architectures
> > actually build and work from mainline is really important to have
> > useful kernel package in distributions.
>
> No, there has been no discussion of these patches, so there is no point in
> doing this a few days before 2.6.13. Can we please do this properly for
> 2.6.14?
Notwithstanding the actual content of the patches, I agree there's indeed no
need to hurry (unless Christoph's unifying Debian kernel hat is weighting a
lot).
A few months of delay for 2.6.14 is almost unnoticeable on the Linux/m68k
timescale anyway ;-)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |