Re: Inotify problem [was Re: 2.6.13-rc6-mm1]

On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 09:47 -0400, Robert Love wrote:

> Let's just pass zero for the "above" parameter in idr_get_new_above(),
> which is I believe the behavior of the other interface, and see if the
> 1024-multiple problem goes away.  We definitely did not have that
> before.

Will we then need to test if it fails for more than 1024 watches?

If I adjust the program to

1) create /tmp/test/%d
2) watch /tmp/test/%d
3) repeat

it fails on 2.6.13-rc6 as soon as the device is full and doesn't hold
any more directories.

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Inotify problem [was Re: 2.6.13-rc6-mm1]
    • From: John McCutchan <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Inotify problem [was Re: 2.6.13-rc6-mm1]
    • From: Reuben Farrelly <[email protected]>
  • Re: Inotify problem [was Re: 2.6.13-rc6-mm1]
    • From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
  • Re: Inotify problem [was Re: 2.6.13-rc6-mm1]
    • From: John McCutchan <[email protected]>
  • Re: Inotify problem [was Re: 2.6.13-rc6-mm1]
    • From: Robert Love <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Inotify problem [was Re: 2.6.13-rc6-mm1]
• Next by Date: Re: Linux-2.6.13-rc7
• Previous by thread: Re: Inotify problem [was Re: 2.6.13-rc6-mm1]
• Next by thread: Re: Inotify problem [was Re: 2.6.13-rc6-mm1]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]