On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 09:47 -0400, Robert Love wrote: > Let's just pass zero for the "above" parameter in idr_get_new_above(), > which is I believe the behavior of the other interface, and see if the > 1024-multiple problem goes away. We definitely did not have that > before. Will we then need to test if it fails for more than 1024 watches? If I adjust the program to 1) create /tmp/test/%d 2) watch /tmp/test/%d 3) repeat it fails on 2.6.13-rc6 as soon as the device is full and doesn't hold any more directories. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Inotify problem [was Re: 2.6.13-rc6-mm1]
- From: John McCutchan <[email protected]>
- Re: Inotify problem [was Re: 2.6.13-rc6-mm1]
- References:
- Inotify problem [was Re: 2.6.13-rc6-mm1]
- From: Reuben Farrelly <[email protected]>
- Re: Inotify problem [was Re: 2.6.13-rc6-mm1]
- From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
- Re: Inotify problem [was Re: 2.6.13-rc6-mm1]
- From: John McCutchan <[email protected]>
- Re: Inotify problem [was Re: 2.6.13-rc6-mm1]
- From: Robert Love <[email protected]>
- Inotify problem [was Re: 2.6.13-rc6-mm1]
- Prev by Date: Re: Inotify problem [was Re: 2.6.13-rc6-mm1]
- Next by Date: Re: Linux-2.6.13-rc7
- Previous by thread: Re: Inotify problem [was Re: 2.6.13-rc6-mm1]
- Next by thread: Re: Inotify problem [was Re: 2.6.13-rc6-mm1]
- Index(es):