On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 10:41:27AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >
> > +static inline void setup_thread_info(struct task_struct *p, struct thread_info *ti)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> const struct task_struct *p?
Umm... Wouldn't be a problem, but what does it buy? The only caller
has p very much _not_ const pointer and since it's inlined, you won't
gain any optimizations in the caller out of it.
> > +{
> > + *ti = *p->thread_info;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline unsigned long *end_of_stack(struct task_struct *p)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> const struct task_struct *p?
That one is OK, but then you really want const pointer out of it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |