* James Morris ([email protected]) wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Chris Wright wrote:
>
> > This is based on Kurt's original work. The net effect is that
> > LSM hooks are called conditionally, and in all cases capabilities
> > provide the defaults. I've done some basic performance testing, and
> > found nothing surprising.
>
> Do you mean nothing noticable?
I did only microbenchmarking, which was as much as double digit percentage
faster (on P4), nothing was slower.
> > I'm interested to see numbers from others
> > before I push this up. These are against Linus' current git tree (they
> > will clash with the -mm tree).
>
> Are there any numbers for popular architectures like i386 and x86_64?
I'll have some numbers tomorrow. If you'd like to run SELinux that'd
be quite useful.
thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |