Hi Marcelo,
> All of these seem to be cleanups/cosmetic enhancements rather than
> real bugfixes, except the ML address update.
Patches 1/5, 3/5 and 4/5 are typo fixes in documentation and comments.
5/5 however qualifies as (minor) bug fix IMHO, as missing newlines in
log messages will cause the next message's log level not to be
interpreted as such.
> As you know, we've been trying to reduce the scope of patch acceptance
> in v2.4.x to strictly necessary changes.
>
> Do any of these fall into this criteria?
I sent you these patches because I thought they were worth applying,
obviously, so don't ask me. Apply them or discard them as you feel like,
it's really up to you, not me. From that, I'll know what kind of patches
are worth sending next time.
Thanks,
--
Jean Delvare
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |