Hi, > The following patch does not use MMX regsiters so that we don't have > to worry about save/restore the FPU/MMX states. > > What do you think? I think __copy_user_zeroing_intel_nocache() should be followed by sfence or mfence instruction to flush the data. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cache pollution aware __copy_from_user_ll()
- From: Hiro Yoshioka <hyoshiok@miraclelinux.com>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cache pollution aware __copy_from_user_ll()
- References:
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cache pollution aware __copy_from_user_ll()
- From: Hiro Yoshioka <lkml.hyoshiok@gmail.com>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cache pollution aware __copy_from_user_ll()
- From: Hiro Yoshioka <hyoshiok@miraclelinux.com>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cache pollution aware __copy_from_user_ll()
- From: Hiro Yoshioka <hyoshiok@miraclelinux.com>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cache pollution aware __copy_from_user_ll()
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] (11/43) Kconfig fix (infiniband and PCI)
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.12 Performance problems
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cache pollution aware __copy_from_user_ll()
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cache pollution aware __copy_from_user_ll()
- Index(es):
