Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-rc6] cpu_exclusive sched domains build fix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: "Dinakar Guniguntala" <dino@in.ibm.com>
Can we hold on to this patch for a while, as I reported yesterday,
this hangs up my ppc64 box on doing rmdir on a exclusive cpuset.
Still debugging the problem, hope to have a fix soon, Thanks
Paul's patch simply constrains the scope of cpuset configurations that will 
invoke the "dynamic sched domains" functionality, which means that some 
cpu-exclusive (a.k.a. "isolated") cpusets will continue to have the 
2.6.12-and-earlier behavior of being periodically examined by the CPU 
Scheduler in load-balancing activities.  That is, Paul's patch simply reverts 
cpuset/sched domain behavior to pre-2.6.13 status (for some cpusets).
The pre-2.6.13 non-"dynamic sched domains" behavior will in fact produce bad 
load-balancing behavior if a cpu-exclusive cpuset is so heavily loaded with 
executing processes, all pinned to the cpu(s) in the cpuset, that the other 
cpus in the system see this cpu(s)/node as the most-heavily-loaded and just 
focus on it during load-balancing -- which would be futile, of course, since 
the processes pinned to this highest-load cpu (and node) cannot be offloaded. 
Since load-balancing looks only at the most-heavily-loaded cpu as a cpu to 
offload, this means that all system load-balancing would be effectively turned 
off.
John Hawkes 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux