On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Sorry, the whole behaviour is complety fine. I just don't thing the name
> and calling convention of file_to_extint_device is optimal. It should
> take an struct inode * and be called just to_extint_device or someting.
> The above would become
>
> struct extint_device *ed = to_extint_device(filp->f_dentry->d_inode);
OK, no problem, since file_to_extint_device() went away anyway.
Brent
--
Brent Casavant If you had nothing to fear,
[email protected] how then could you be brave?
Silicon Graphics, Inc. -- Queen Dama, Source Wars
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |