> On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 10:43:35PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > 64 bit architectures all implement their own compatibility sys_open(), > > when in fact the difference is simply not forcing the O_LARGEFILE > > flag. So use the a common function instead. > > Traditional naming would be just do_open(), but else this looks very nice. do_open() was my first choice, but it caused a number of clashes. Miklos - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 6/8] remove duplicated sys_open32() code from 64bit archs
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 6/8] remove duplicated sys_open32() code from 64bit archs
- References:
- [PATCH 0/8] filesystem related cleanups and fixes
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/8] remove ia_attr_flags
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 2/8] namei cleanup
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 3/8] use get_fs_struct() in proc
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 4/8] fix enum pid_directory_inos in proc/base.c
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 5/8] remove duplicated code from proc and ptrace
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 6/8] remove duplicated sys_open32() code from 64bit archs
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 6/8] remove duplicated sys_open32() code from 64bit archs
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 0/8] filesystem related cleanups and fixes
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 6/8] remove duplicated sys_open32() code from 64bit archs
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 6/8] remove duplicated sys_open32() code from 64bit archs
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 6/8] remove duplicated sys_open32() code from 64bit archs
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 6/8] remove duplicated sys_open32() code from 64bit archs
- Index(es):
