Re: [PATCH -mm 3/3] [LSM] Stacking support for inode_init_security

* Adrian Bunk ([email protected]) wrote:
> You want to build these modules always and always modular?
> 
> No matter whether the security subsystem is built modular or static?
> 
> No matter whether the user has enabled or completely disabled the 
> security subsystem?

The modules are just for testing, and shouldn't be added at all.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH -mm 3/3] [LSM] Stacking support for inode_init_security
    • From: [email protected]

• References:
  • [PATCH -mm] [LSM] Stacking support for inode_init_security
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: [PATCH -mm 3/3] [LSM] Stacking support for inode_init_security
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: [PATCH -mm 3/3] [LSM] Stacking support for inode_init_security
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: [PATCH -mm 3/3] [LSM] Stacking support for inode_init_security
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: tcpdump confused with NAT-T+IPSec Packets
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cache pollution aware __copy_from_user_ll()
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH -mm 3/3] [LSM] Stacking support for inode_init_security
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH -mm 3/3] [LSM] Stacking support for inode_init_security
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]