On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 17:33 -0700, Luben Tuikov wrote:
> No preallocation is done from IRQ context. Do not spread FUD.
> It seems to me that you're unaware how IDR works and unaware how
> the driver works.
Argumentum ad Hominem now ... we'll get them all eventually.
Since you won't post the usage code, just answer this: how does what
you're doing with idr differ from its originally designed consumer: the
posix timers which also do the idr_remove() in IRQ context?
To me it seems your argument applies to this case as well, but you
didn't quote it when asked for an example, so I assume there's some
difference that I don't understand.
James
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |