Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > @@ -1427,7 +1434,18 @@ send_group_sigqueue(int sig, struct sigq > int ret = 0; > > BUG_ON(!(q->flags & SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC)); > - read_lock(&tasklist_lock); > +retry: > + if (unlikely(p->flags & PF_EXITING)) > + return -1; > + I don't think this is correct. p == ->group_leader, it may have been exited and in EXIT_ZOMBIE state. But the thread group (process) is live, we should not stop posix timers. Oleg. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] fix send_sigqueue() vs thread exit race
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
- Re: [PATCH] fix send_sigqueue() vs thread exit race
- References:
- 2.6.13-rc6-rt9
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- [PATCH 2.6.13-rc6-rt9] PI aware dynamic priority adjustment
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
- [PATCH] fix send_sigqueue() vs thread exit race
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
- Re: [PATCH] fix send_sigqueue() vs thread exit race
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
- Re: [PATCH] fix send_sigqueue() vs thread exit race
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
- Re: [PATCH] fix send_sigqueue() vs thread exit race
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
- Re: [PATCH] fix send_sigqueue() vs thread exit race
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
- 2.6.13-rc6-rt9
- Prev by Date: Re: strange CRASH_DUMP dependencies
- Next by Date: 2.6.13-rc6 JFS Oops trace
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] fix send_sigqueue() vs thread exit race
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] fix send_sigqueue() vs thread exit race
- Index(es):
