> 2) low latency version of cache aware copy Having a low latency version that is only active with CONFIG_PREEMPT is bad - non preempt kernels need good latency too. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cache pollution aware __copy_from_user_ll()
- From: Hiro Yoshioka <lkml.hyoshiok@gmail.com>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cache pollution aware __copy_from_user_ll()
- From: Hiro Yoshioka <hyoshiok@miraclelinux.com>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cache pollution aware __copy_from_user_ll()
- From: Hiro Yoshioka <lkml.hyoshiok@gmail.com>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cache pollution aware __copy_from_user_ll()
- From: Hiro Yoshioka <hyoshiok@miraclelinux.com>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cache pollution aware __copy_from_user_ll()
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/2] external interrupts
- Next by Date: Re: sched_yield() makes OpenLDAP slow
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cache pollution aware __copy_from_user_ll()
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cache pollution aware __copy_from_user_ll()
- Index(es):
