Imanpreet Arora <[email protected]> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> For the last couple of days, I have been trying to set
> up linux kernel under 8MB. So far I have set up a linux 2.4.31, which
> just works under 8MB. However, I would be grateful if someone could
> help with the following queries
>
> a) Is linux2.4 just the right option? What about linux 2.0.x?
> Or for that matter even <2.0
2.4 is the worst choice. You want either 2.6 + patches from
the linux-tiny project or you want a noticably older kernel.
The 2.6 option as it is works with what is being developed should
be the more maintainable option.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |