Re: [patch 2.6.13-rc6] net/802/tr: use interrupt-safe locking

Jay Vosburgh <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>  >FWIW, this patch is currently being carried in the Fedora and RHEL
>  >kernels.  It certainly looks like it is necessary to me.  Can we get
>  >some movement on this?
> 
>  	It's in the SuSE kernel as well.

For how long has this fix been in the vendor kernels?

Could someone please tell us why there are unmerged bugfixes in vendor
kernels?

Are there any more?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch 2.6.13-rc6] net/802/tr: use interrupt-safe locking
    • From: "John W. Linville" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 2.6.13-rc6] net/802/tr: use interrupt-safe locking
    • From: Jay Vosburgh <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.12.5 1/2] lib: allow idr to be used in irq context
• Next by Date: Re: Kernel BUG at "fs/exec.c":777
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 2.6.13-rc6] net/802/tr: use interrupt-safe locking
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 2.6.13-rc6] net/802/tr: use interrupt-safe locking
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]