Rusty Russell <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 00:10 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Rusty Russell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I believe we just ignored sparc64. That usually works for solving these
> > > kind of bugs. 8)
> >
> > heh. iirc, it was demonstrable on x86 also.
>
> No. gcc-2.95 on Sparc64 put uninititialized vars into the bss, ignoring
> the __attribute__((section(".data.percpu"))) directive. x86 certainly
> doesn't have this, I just tested it w/2.95.
>
> Really, it's Sparc64 + gcc-2.95. Send an urgent telegram to the user
> telling them to upgrade.
I recently asked if gcc-2.95 was really still supported, and was told that
it is in common use for its speed...
--
Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |