On Saturday 20 August 2005 16:31, Joel Becker wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 08:01:17PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > The recent changes to sysfs should be ported to configfs to do this.
>
> Yeah, I've been meaning to do something, and resusing code is
> always a good plan.
Ending up with the same code in core kernel in two different places is always
a bad plan. Oh man. Just look at these two bodies of code, configfs is
mostly just large tracts that are identical to sysfs except for name changes.
Listen to what the code is trying to tell you!
SysFS:
struct kobject {
const char * k_name;
char name[KOBJ_NAME_LEN];
struct kref kref;
struct list_head entry;
struct kobject * parent;
struct kset * kset;
struct kobj_type * ktype;
struct dentry * dentry;
};
ConfigFS:
struct config_item {
char *ci_name;
char ci_namebuf[CONFIGFS_ITEM_NAME_LEN];
struct kref ci_kref;
struct list_head ci_entry;
struct config_item *ci_parent;
struct config_group *ci_group;
struct config_item_type *ci_type;
struct dentry *ci_dentry;
};
Big difference, huh?
As designer of configfs, could you please offer your take on why it cannot be
rolled back into sysfs, considering that it is mostly identical already?
Regards,
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |