George,
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 17:19 -0700, George Anzinger wrote:
> > 2. Drift of cyclic timers (armed by set_timer()):
> >
> > Due to rounding errors and the drift adjustment code, the fixed
> > increment which is precalculated when the timer is set up and added on
> > rearm, I see creeping deviation from the timeline.
> >
> > I have a patch lined up to base the rearm on human (nsac) units, so this
> > effect will go away. But this is waste of time until (1.) is not solved.
> >
> > George ???
>
> Could I (we) see what you have in mind?
Nothing which applies clean at the moment and I have no access to the
box where the patch floats around.
It's simply explained.
Current code:
set_timer()
calc interval->jiffies / interval->arch_cycles;
based on it.interval
rearm()
timer->expires += interval->jiffies;
timer->arch_cycle_expires += interval->arch_cycles;
normalize(timer);
Patched code:
set_timer()
timer.interval = it.interval;
timer.next_expire = it.value;
both stored as timespec
rearm()
next_expire += interval;
calc timer->expires/arch_cycle_expires;
So on each rearm we eliminate the rounding errors and take the drift
adjustment into account.
It adds some calculation overhead to each rearm, but ....
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |