Tejun Heo wrote:
Heh... Maybe I'm just reluctant to let go of my patches. Anyways, I'll
now stand down and see how things go and try to help.
Note that my email simply describes a long term target. For the short
term, and perhaps medium term, libata will continue to use
->eh_strategy_handler().
Given Mark's messages, my own knowledge, and other reports, there
continues to be room for improvement in the current EH code.
In general, we need to distinguish between PCI bus errors, SATA bus
errors, and ATA device errors, and handle each error class
appropriately. In the SCSI layer, ->eh_strategy_handler() or no, this
will likely consist of taking the SCSI device offline and dealing with
the error(s).
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |