On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 01:28 pm, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 05:09 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > Hi,
> > here are interbench v0.29 resoults:
>
> The X test under simulated "Compile" load looks most interesting.
>
> Most of the schedulers do quite poorly on this test - only Zaphod with
> default max_ia_bonus and max_tpt_bonus manages to deliver under 100ms
> max latency. As expected with interactivity bonus disabled it performs
> horribly.
The compile load is not a real compile load; it is an extreme exaggeration of
what happens during a compile and this is done to increase the sensitivity of
this test. It is _not_ worth trying to get a perfect score in this.
> I'd like to see some results with X reniced to -10. Despite what the
> 2.6 release notes say, this still seems to make a difference.
Well of course it helps X - but then any X load totally fscks up audio on
mainline and staircase which is why it's recommended not to renice it.
Cheers,
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |