From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 04:29:55 +1000 > Calling itanium the "fastest 64bit processor at any given clock frequency" > on lkml is likewise inflammatory :) I totally agree. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Multiple virtual address mapping for the same code on IA-64 linux kernel.
- From: George Anzinger <george@mvista.com>
- Re: Multiple virtual address mapping for the same code on IA-64 linux kernel.
- References:
- Re: Multiple virtual address mapping for the same code on IA-64 linux kernel.
- From: vamsi krishna <vamsi.krishnak@gmail.com>
- Re: Multiple virtual address mapping for the same code on IA-64 linux kernel.
- From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>
- Re: Multiple virtual address mapping for the same code on IA-64 linux kernel.
- From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
- Re: Multiple virtual address mapping for the same code on IA-64 linux kernel.
- Prev by Date: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: idle task's task_t allocation on NUMA machines
- Next by Date: Re: [Hdaps-devel] Re: HDAPS, Need to park the head for real
- Previous by thread: Re: Multiple virtual address mapping for the same code on IA-64 linux kernel.
- Next by thread: Re: Multiple virtual address mapping for the same code on IA-64 linux kernel.
- Index(es):
