Re: idle task's task_t allocation on NUMA machines

Eric Dumazet, le Thu 18 Aug 2005 17:18:55 +0200, a écrit :
> I believe IRQ stacks are also allocated on node 0, that seems more serious.

For the i386 architecture at least, yes: they are statically defined in
arch/i386/kernel/irq.c, while they could be per_cpu.

Regards,
Samuel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: idle task's task_t allocation on NUMA machines
  - From: Samuel Thibault <[email protected]>

References:
- idle task's task_t allocation on NUMA machines
  - From: Samuel Thibault <[email protected]>
- Re: idle task's task_t allocation on NUMA machines
  - From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: How to support partitions in driver?
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] add transport class symlink to device object
Previous by thread: Re: idle task's task_t allocation on NUMA machines
Next by thread: Re: idle task's task_t allocation on NUMA machines
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]