Re: pmac_nvram problems

[Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>]

On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 15:00 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> There used to be cases where we used the nvram stuff before kmalloc()
> was available. I'll check if this is still the case.

Ah, ok. Makes sense. In that case I suppose it must be #ifdef'ed for the
module case.
 
> Well... the driver doesn't expect you to boot a different OS while
> suspended to disk :)

Yeah :) It'd be nice though since except for that I haven't found any
other adverse effects.

> Regarding caching the data in memory, this is done becaues nvram is
> actually a flash on recent machines, and you really want to limit the
> number of write cycles to it.

Ok, makes sense. When I get some time I'll look into converting and
implementing reloading for that case, but now that I compile as a module
and unload it, it hardly is a priority.

Thanks for your answers,
johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part