On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Alan,
>
> I am sorry I don't have time to properly review the patch at
> themoment, just a couple of comments about serio - I would not look at
> serio for examples of typical use as it was trying very hard to work
> around the original driver model limitation that prevented drivers to
> register childern on the same bus from their probe function. I think
> now that that limitation is lifted serio implemenation can be
> simplified.
Okay. The same comments may apply to the other users of
device_bind_driver. Apart from a couple in the USB stack that I can
handle already, those users are:
drivers/pnp/card.c
drivers/input/serio/serio.c
drivers/input/gameport/gameport.c
Presumably the gameport code is very similar to the serio code.
Interestingly, callers of device_release_driver include:
drivers/pnp/card.c
drivers/input/serio/serio.c
drivers/input/gameport/gameport.c
drivers/ide/ide-proc.c
drivers/ieee1394/nodemgr.c
It's not obvious (to me) why ide-proc.c and nodemgr.c call one but not the
other.
Anyway, I appreciate you taking the time to comment on this work. When
you've had a chance to read through that patch, let me know what you
think.
Alan Stern
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |