asm/segment.h?

Looking at some architectures it appears that asm/uaccess.h should be used instead of asm/segment.h. Is this generally true that code in segment.h should be moved into uaccess.h or is it still valid for an architecture to have segment.h?

I'm cleaning up arch/ppc and arch/ppc64 and was wondering about everyone else.

- kumar
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: asm/segment.h?
    • From: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Multiple virtual address mapping for the same code on IA-64 linux kernel.
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2.6.13-rc6] add Dell Systems Management Base Driver (dcdbas) with sysfs support
• Previous by thread: Multiple virtual address mapping for the same code on IA-64 linux kernel.
• Next by thread: Re: asm/segment.h?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]