Re: [PATCH 7/14] i386 / Add some descriptor convenience functions

* Zachary Amsden ([email protected]) wrote:
> I think so too.  I merely moved the code here and didn't notice it in 
> all this excitement.
> 
> 0x00cf9a000xff306600  =>
> 
> Present CPL-0 32-bit code segment, base 0x0000ff30, limit 0xf6601 pages, 
> for which desc_empty(desc) is true.
> 
> Thankfully, this is not used as a security check, but it can falsely 
> overwrite TLS segments with carefully chosen base / limits.  I do not 
> believe this is an issue in practice, but it is a kernel bug.
> 
> Nice catch.  Looks like it affects all 2.6.X kernels.

Thanks, I added this to virt tree, and will push baseline fix up.

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 7/14] i386 / Add some descriptor convenience functions
    • From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 7/14] i386 / Add some descriptor convenience functions
    • From: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Flash erase groups and filesystems
• Next by Date: [PATCH] Posix file attribute support on VFAT (take #2)
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 7/14] i386 / Add some descriptor convenience functions
• Next by thread: [PATCH] clean up missing overflow check in get_blkdev_list
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]