Re: [RFC,PATCH] Use RCU to protect tasklist for unicast signals

* Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> wrote:

> OK, the attached instead revalidates that the task struct still 
> references the sighand_struct after obtaining the lock (and passes 
> kernbench and LTP, which tells me I need to get better tests!).

i've applied this to the -RT tree, and it's looking good so far from a 
basic stability POV.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [RFC,PATCH] Use RCU to protect tasklist for unicast signals
  - From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC,PATCH] Use RCU to protect tasklist for unicast signals
  - From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC,PATCH] Use RCU to protect tasklist for unicast signals
  - From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC,PATCH] Use RCU to protect tasklist for unicast signals
  - From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Upgrade from 2.6.10-ac8 to 2.6.12.5 broke lvm rootfs
Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2.6.13-rc6] add Dell Systems Management Base Driver (dcdbas) with sysfs support
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC,PATCH] Use RCU to protect tasklist for unicast signals
Next by thread: Re: [RFC,PATCH] Use RCU to protect tasklist for unicast signals
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]