Re: [RFC,PATCH] Use RCU to protect tasklist for unicast signals

* Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> wrote:

> OK, the attached instead revalidates that the task struct still 
> references the sighand_struct after obtaining the lock (and passes 
> kernbench and LTP, which tells me I need to get better tests!).

i've applied this to the -RT tree, and it's looking good so far from a 
basic stability POV.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [RFC,PATCH] Use RCU to protect tasklist for unicast signals
    • From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC,PATCH] Use RCU to protect tasklist for unicast signals
    • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC,PATCH] Use RCU to protect tasklist for unicast signals
    • From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC,PATCH] Use RCU to protect tasklist for unicast signals
    • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Upgrade from 2.6.10-ac8 to 2.6.12.5 broke lvm rootfs
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2.6.13-rc6] add Dell Systems Management Base Driver (dcdbas) with sysfs support
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC,PATCH] Use RCU to protect tasklist for unicast signals
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC,PATCH] Use RCU to protect tasklist for unicast signals
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]