On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 23:58:43 CDT, Michael E Brown said: > No, this is an _EXCELLENT_ reason why _LESS_ of this should be in the > kernel. Why should we have to duplicate a _TON_ of code inside the > kernel to figure out which platform we are on, and then look up in a > table which method to use for that platform? We have a _MUCH_ nicer > programming environment available to us in userspace where we can use > things like libsmbios to look up the platform type, then look in an > easily-updateable text file which smi type to use. In general, plugging > the wrong value here is a no-op. You'll still need to do some *very* basic checking - there's fairly scary-looking 'outb' call in callintf_smi() and host_control_smi() that seems to be totally too trusting that The Right Thing is located at address CMOS_BASE_PORT: + for (index = PE1300_CMOS_CMD_STRUCT_PTR; + index < (PE1300_CMOS_CMD_STRUCT_PTR + 4); + index++) { + outb(index, + (CMOS_BASE_PORT + CMOS_PAGE2_INDEX_PORT_PIIX4)); + outb(*data++, + (CMOS_BASE_PORT + CMOS_PAGE2_DATA_PORT_PIIX4)); + } This Dell C840 has an 845, not a PIIX. What just got toasted if this driver gets called? Can we have a check that the machine is (a) a Dell and (b) has a PIIX and (c) the PIIX has a functional SMI behind it, before we start doing outb() calls?
Attachment:
pgp2eQYEjXRx5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2.6.13-rc6] add Dell Systems Management Base Driver (dcdbas) with sysfs support
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cache pollution aware __copy_from_user_ll()
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2.6.13-rc6] add Dell Systems Management Base Driver (dcdbas) with sysfs support
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2.6.13-rc6] add Dell Systems Management Base Driver (dcdbas) with sysfs support
- Index(es):