Re: [GIT PATCH] scsi bug fixes for 2.6.13

On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:

> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, James Bottomley wrote:
> 
> > OK, why don't we do this.  Instead of having me trawl through the trees
> > looking for the correct patch to reverse, why don't you attach it in an
> > email and I'll try to get it in to 2.6.13?
> 
> Looks like just reverting that patch is not enough. More in about 12 
> hours.

Sorry, forget it, just tested here with (pseudo-)highmem on SMP . just 
reverting the patch does indeed fix the driver.

Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [GIT PATCH] scsi bug fixes for 2.6.13
    • From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
  • Re: [GIT PATCH] scsi bug fixes for 2.6.13
    • From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[email protected]>
  • Re: [GIT PATCH] scsi bug fixes for 2.6.13
    • From: James Bottomley <[email protected]>
  • Re: [GIT PATCH] scsi bug fixes for 2.6.13
    • From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [-mm PATCH 2/32] fs: fix-up schedule_timeout() usage
• Next by Date: [-mm PATCH 3/32] kernel: fix-up schedule_timeout() usage
• Previous by thread: Re: [GIT PATCH] scsi bug fixes for 2.6.13
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] Access Control Lists for tmpfs and /dev/pts
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]