Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cache pollution aware __copy_from_user_ll()

On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 17:02 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 08:15 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
> > > Actually, is there any place *other* than write() to the page cache that
> > > warrants a non-temporal store?  Network sockets with scatter/gather and
> > > hardware checksum, maybe?
> > 
> > afaik those use zero copy already, eg straight pagecache copy.
> 
> Only if you use sendfile(). And the normal write path uses csum_copy_* 

but do those use s/g ? and hw csum?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cache pollution aware __copy_from_user_ll()
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cache pollution aware __copy_from_user_ll()
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cache pollution aware __copy_from_user_ll()
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cache pollution aware __copy_from_user_ll()
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cache pollution aware __copy_from_user_ll()
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cache pollution aware __copy_from_user_ll()
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]