Re: [patch 18/39] remap_file_pages protection support: add VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Russell King wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:21:45PM +0200, [email protected] wrote:

@@ -632,10 +632,11 @@ static inline int page_mapped(struct pag
 * Used to decide whether a process gets delivered SIGBUS or
 * just gets major/minor fault counters bumped up.
 */
-#define VM_FAULT_OOM	(-1)
-#define VM_FAULT_SIGBUS	0
-#define VM_FAULT_MINOR	1
-#define VM_FAULT_MAJOR	2
+#define VM_FAULT_OOM		(-1)
+#define VM_FAULT_SIGBUS		0
+#define VM_FAULT_MINOR		1
+#define VM_FAULT_MAJOR		2
+#define VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV	3

#define offset_in_page(p)	((unsigned long)(p) & ~PAGE_MASK)



Please arrange for "success" values to be numerically larger than "failure"
values.  This will avoid breaking ARM.

Is there a reason why we don't use -ve numbers for failure and +ve for
success here?


Well there is now, and that is we are now using a bit in the 2nd
byte as flags. So I had to do away with -ve numbers there entirely.

You could achieve a similar thing by using another bit in that byte
#define VM_FAULT_FAILED 0x20
and make that bit present in VM_FAULT_OOM and VM_FAULT_SIGBUS, then
do an unlikely test for that bit in your handler and branch away to
the slow path.

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com -
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux