Re: [PATCH] Add removal schedule of register_serial/unregister_serial to appropriate file

On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:30:34AM -0700, Max Asbock wrote:
> I am converting the ibmasm driver that uses (un)register_serial to use
> serial_8250_(un)register_port. However I find function prototypes for
> the new interfaces only in linux/drivers/char/8250.h. Is there a reason
> there aren't any extern declarations for these functions in
> linux/include/serial.h or linux/include/serial_8250.h?

Probably because nothing outside drivers/serial uses these functions at
the moment.

They could be moved to include/linux/serial_8250.h though.  Patch welcome.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Add removal schedule of register_serial/unregister_serial to appropriate file
  - From: Russell King <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Add removal schedule of register_serial/unregister_serial to appropriate file
  - From: Max Asbock <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] add transport class symlink to device object
Next by Date: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cache pollution aware __copy_from_user_ll()
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Add removal schedule of register_serial/unregister_serial to appropriate file
Next by thread: Problem with kernel 2.6.11
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]