On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:26, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 09:29:20 +1000, Con Kolivas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Remember that dmesg diff you sent? That's the one. If you strace > > > the digikamcameracl, it probably keels over after EBUSY. > > > > Nice shot! Got it in one. bugzilla updated with confirmation. > > > > So how do we proceed with this one? Do I need to file a digikam bug > > report too? > > Since I never encountered it, I'm not versed in the switching of > the current altsetting. I suppose, this has to be discussed between > digikam developers and linux-usb-devel (Alan Stern probably knows > how that has to be done). It's very likely that all digikam needs > is to claim the interface after the altsetting was switched... > But I really do not know. Ok I've investigated further and had a pointer from Andrew Clayton who fixes this problem with a gphoto2 upgrade. The issue is a libgphoto2 one and kernels 2.6.13+ will require libgphoto2 2.1.6 or later to work properly. To sort this out before 2.6.13 comes out and it bites a lot of people - as most distros will have this problem - I suggest pointing them to the bugzilla entry as a FAQ: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5063 Cheers, Con
Attachment:
pgp5uzagRGkm0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Re: usb camera failing in 2.6.13-rc6
- From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>
- Re: usb camera failing in 2.6.13-rc6
- From: Pete Zaitcev <[email protected]>
- Re: usb camera failing in 2.6.13-rc6
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.13-rc5-mm1: BUG: rwlock recursion on CPU#0
- Next by Date: slab cache size-32 objects growing forever
- Previous by thread: Re: usb camera failing in 2.6.13-rc6
- Next by thread: oops in 2.6.13-rc6
- Index(es):
