Re: Opening of blocking FIFOs not reliable?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Aug 14, 2005, at 3:15, Manfred Spraul wrote:

Opening a FIFO for WR_ONLY should release a previously blocked RD_ONLY open. I suspect this is not guaranteed on a heavily loaded Linux box.

Do you have a test case?
IIRC we had that bug, and it was fixed by adding PIPE_WCOUNTER:
PIPE_WRITERS counts the number of writers. This one is decreased during close(). PIPE_WCOUNTER counts how often a writer was seen. It's never decreased. Readers that wait for a writer wait until PIPE_WCOUNTER changes, they do not look at PIPE_WRITERS.

Ah, I missed the semantics of WCOUNTER. True, writer's open should always release the reader' s open (as Alan pointed out).

I do have a test application, which experienced dead-locked readers' opens before I artificially delayed writers' closes. The application runs on PlanetLab, which uses VServer, though. I'll try to construct next a minimal test case based on the application and reproduce the behavior on a vanilla box...

Teemu

--

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux