Re: [PATCH] Watchdog device node name unification

On Sat, 13 Aug 2005, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> 
> The last patch was accidentally against 2.6.12 - this one is against
> 2.6.13-rc6.

Doesn't seem to be serious enough to be worth it at this late stage in the 
2.6.13 game. Can you re-send after I do a release?

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Watchdog device node name unification
    • From: Henrik Brix Andersen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Watchdog device node name unification
    • From: Henrik Brix Andersen <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] Watchdog device node name unification
    • From: Henrik Brix Andersen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Watchdog device node name unification
    • From: Henrik Brix Andersen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-rc6 1/2] New Syscall: get rlimits of any process
• Next by Date: [PATCH] configurable debug info from radeonfb old driver
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Watchdog device node name unification
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Watchdog device node name unification
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]