Re: [PATCH] Convert sigaction to act like other unices

On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 14:39 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:

> <rest snipped which also wasn't better>

Also, what you snipped was another issue, not addressed by the patch.
Some architectures test if the setting up of the signal handler stack
frame succeeded, and others don't.  I believe that this may be a
problem, since it was recently fixed on the x86, and probably should be
addressed on the architectures that don't check for failure.

-- Steve



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] Convert sigaction to act like other unices
    • From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Convert sigaction to act like other unices
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Convert sigaction to act like other unices
• Next by Date: Re: BSD jail
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Convert sigaction to act like other unices
• Next by thread: Opening of blocking FIFOs not reliable?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]