Re: [PATCH 2.6.12.3] PCI/libata INTx cleanup

[Brian Gerst <bgerst@didntduck.org>]

Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 01:10:43PM -0400, Brett Russ wrote:
>
> > Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> > > Brett Russ wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > Simple cleanup to eliminate X copies of the same function in libata.  
> > > > Moved pci_enable_intx() to pci.c, added pci_disable_intx() as well, 
> > > > and use them throughout libata and msi.c.
> > > > Signed-off-by: Brett Russ <russb@emc.com>
> > >
> > > Though there is nothing wrong with this patch, I would prefer a single 
> > > function, pci_intx(), as found in drivers/scsi/ahci.c.
> > > Would you be willing to move that one to the PCI layer, eliminate the 
> > > multiple copies of pci_enable_intx(), and replace the calls to 
> > > pci_enable_intx() with calls to pci_intx() ?
> > Sounds like what I did, except for the naming change.  I did away with
> > pci_disable_intx() and changed the names.  Look ok?
>
> Looks ok to me, care to resend it with a Signed-off-by: and a new
> changelog entry so I can apply it?
>
>
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_intx);
>
> Hm, for new pci functions, I prefer to have them marked as
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(), is that ok with you?
It's not really "new".  It's simply a trivial wrapper around other pci 
functions.
--
				Brian Gerst
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/