Re: [discuss] Re: 2.6.13-rc2 with dual way dual core ck804 MB

[yhlu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>]

andi,

is it possible for
after the AP1 call_in is done and before AP1 get in tsc_sync_wait
The AP2 call_in done.  and then AP1 get in tsc_sync_wait and before it
done, AP2 get in tsc_sync_wait too.

sync_master can not figure out from AP1 or AP2 because only have
go[MASTER] and go{SLAVE].

YH

On 8/10/05, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 05:43:23PM -0700, yhlu wrote:
> > Yes, I mean more aggressive
> >
> > static void __init smp_init(void)
> > {
> >         unsigned int i;
> >
> >         /* FIXME: This should be done in userspace --RR */
> >         for_each_present_cpu(i) {
> >                 if (num_online_cpus() >= max_cpus)
> >                         break;
> >                 if (!cpu_online(i))
> >                         cpu_up(i);
> >         }
> >
> >
> > let cpu_up take one array instead of one int.
> 
> It can be done already by just not starting the CPUs and
> then do it multithreaded from user space using sysfs with
> the CPU hotplug infrastructure. Unfortunately cpu_up
> right now has a global semaphore, so it won't save you any
> time. However it could be done in parallel with other
> startup jobs.
> 
> -Andi
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/