On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 11:56 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > For the record, some shortcomings of this patch:
> >
> > o Needs lots more testing on more architectures.
> >
> > o Needs performance and stress testing.
> >
> > o Needs testing in Ingo's PREEMPT_RT environment.
>
> cool patch! I have integrated it into my PREEMPT_RT tree, and all it
> needed to boot was the patch below (doesnt affect the upstream kernel).
> Using the raw IRQ flag isnt an issue in the RCU code, all the affected
> codepaths are small and deterministic.
>
Ingo,
Doesn't this fix the longest latency we were seeing with
PREEMPT_DESKTOP, I don't have a trace handy but the upshot was "signal
delivery must remain atomic on !PREEMPT_RT"?
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |