Jean Delvare <[email protected]> writes: > This is 1.033s down to 0.174s. This is just great, I2C block reads work > and allow faster dumps, as expected. Forgive my ignorance, but does it depend on the south bridge at all? Isn't the block read capability just a function of EEPROM chip on (I assume) RAM module? -- Krzysztof Halasa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: I2C block reads with i2c-viapro: testers wanted
- From: Jean Delvare <[email protected]>
- Re: I2C block reads with i2c-viapro: testers wanted
- References:
- I2C block reads with i2c-viapro: testers wanted
- From: Jean Delvare <[email protected]>
- Re: I2C block reads with i2c-viapro: testers wanted
- From: Hinko Kocevar <[email protected]>
- Re: I2C block reads with i2c-viapro: testers wanted
- From: Jean Delvare <[email protected]>
- Re: I2C block reads with i2c-viapro: testers wanted
- From: Hinko Kocevar <[email protected]>
- Re: I2C block reads with i2c-viapro: testers wanted
- From: Jean Delvare <[email protected]>
- I2C block reads with i2c-viapro: testers wanted
- Prev by Date: Re: System shutdown with during reboot with 2.6.13-pre6
- Next by Date: Re: fcntl(F_GETLEASE) semantics??
- Previous by thread: Re: I2C block reads with i2c-viapro: testers wanted
- Next by thread: Re: I2C block reads with i2c-viapro: testers wanted
- Index(es):
