Re: [PATCH 8/14] i386 / Add a per cpu gdt accessor

Chris Wright wrote:

* Zwane Mwaikambo ([email protected]) wrote:

On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 [email protected] wrote:

Add an accessor function for getting the per-CPU gdt.  Callee must already
have the CPU.

This one seems superfluous to me, does accessing it indirectly generate better code too?

It's prepratory for other work.

I am assuming it has no change on the code, right? (If it does, something is wrong...)

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 8/14] i386 / Add a per cpu gdt accessor
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 8/14] i386 / Add a per cpu gdt accessor
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: [PATCH 8/14] i386 / Add a per cpu gdt accessor
    • From: Zwane Mwaikambo <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 8/14] i386 / Add a per cpu gdt accessor
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: How to reclaim inode pages on demand
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 8/14] i386 / Add a per cpu gdt accessor
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 8/14] i386 / Add a per cpu gdt accessor
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 8/14] i386 / Add a per cpu gdt accessor
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]