Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)

On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 19:13 -0700, john stultz wrote:
> All,
> 	Here's the next rev in my rework of the current timekeeping subsystem.
> No major changes, only some cleanups and further splitting the larger
> patches into smaller ones.

Last I heard this made gettimeofday() 20% slower on x86.  Is this still
the case?

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
    • From: "Ulrich Windl" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
    • From: john stultz <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC - 0/13] NTP cleanup work (v. B5)
    • From: john stultz <[email protected]>
  • [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
    • From: john stultz <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Partitioning problems on x86_64 (fwd)
• Next by Date: [PATCH]hande sysdev suspend failure
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 9/9] generic timekeeping i386 specific timesources
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC - 0/9] Generic timekeeping subsystem (v. B5)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]