James Bottomley a écrit :
Well, but the other alternative is that we hit arbitrary BUG_ON() limits
in systems that create numbered workqueues which is rather contrary to
our scaleability objectives, isn't it?
I think I'd rather the name truncation than have to respond to kernel
BUG()'s. If someone really has a problem with the appearance of ps,
they can always increase TASK_COMM_LEN.
We could truncate the name before adding the CPU number, but it sounds
saner to just prevent anyone passing in excessively long names. Via
BUG_ON, say ;)
What's the actual problem?
What I posted originally; the current SCSI format for a workqueue:
scsi_wq_%d hits the bug after the host number rises to 100, which has
been seen by some enterprise person with > 100 HBAs.
The reason for this name is that the error handler thread is called
scsi_eh_%d; so we could rename all our threads to avoid this, but one
day someone will come along with a huge enough machine to hit whatever
limit we squeeze it down to.
James
In scsi layer (drivers/scsi/hosts.c), wq name length is limited to
KOBJ_NAME_LEN due to the snprintf .
may be nice to use same limit if BUG_ON is kept... but why NULL isn't
returned, then ? ;-)
--
Tempo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |