Re: [PATCH 0/3] New system call, unshare

* Janak Desai:

> With unshare, namespace setup can be done using PAM session
> management functions without patching individual commands.

I don't think it's a good idea to use security-critical code well
without its original specification.  Clearly the current situation
sucks, but this is mainly a lack of PAM functionality, IMHO.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] New system call, unshare
  - From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] New system call, unshare
  - From: [email protected]

References:
- [PATCH 0/3] New system call, unshare
  - From: Janak Desai <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] i386 No-Idle-Hz aka Dynamic-Ticks 5
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 4/5] 2.6.13-rc5-mm1, IPMI, use dmi_find_device()
Previous by thread: [PATCH 0/3] New system call, unshare
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/3] New system call, unshare
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]