On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 12:01:33PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Minimal PowerOP support for Intel Enhanced Speedstep "Centrino"
> > notebooks. These systems run at an operating point comprised of a cpu
> > frequency and a core voltage. The voltage could be set from the values
> > recommended in the datasheets if left unspecified (-1) in the operating
> > point, as cpufreq does.
>
> Eh? I thought these are handled okay by cpufreq already? What is
> advantage of this over cpufreq?
ATM I'm wondering what are the pro for those patches wrt current cpufreq
infrastructure (especially cpufreq's notion of notifiers).
I still don't find a good one but I'm surely missing something obvious.
--
Bruno Ducrot
-- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy?
-- Don't know. Don't care.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |