* Steven Rostedt ([email protected]) wrote: > Hmm, I think you want this patch. You still need to check the return of > setting up the frames. Indeed, I noticecd just after I sent, and sent an updated patch. Thanks Steve! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: Signal handling possibly wrong
- From: Bodo Stroesser <[email protected]>
- Re: Signal handling possibly wrong
- From: Robert Wilkens <[email protected]>
- Re: Signal handling possibly wrong
- From: Bodo Stroesser <[email protected]>
- Re: Signal handling possibly wrong
- From: Robert Wilkens <[email protected]>
- Re: Signal handling possibly wrong
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: Signal handling possibly wrong
- From: Bodo Stroesser <[email protected]>
- Re: Signal handling possibly wrong
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: Signal handling possibly wrong
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: Signal handling possibly wrong
- From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Fix i386 signal handling of NODEFER, should not affect sa_mask (was: Re: Signal handling possibly wrong)
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: Signal handling possibly wrong
- Prev by Date: Re: capabilities patch (v 0.1)
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fix PPC signal handling of NODEFER, should not affect sa_mask
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] Fix i386 signal handling of NODEFER, should not affect sa_mask (was: Re: Signal handling possibly wrong)
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Fix PPC signal handling of NODEFER, should not affect sa_mask
- Index(es):
